Presenter Information

Mike MatisFollow

Document Type

Poster Session

Department

Education and Human Development

Faculty Mentor

Jeff Beaudry

Keywords

UDL Online Course Postsecondary college HE Higher Education

Abstract

The Universal Design for Learning framework offers a synthesis of 40 years worth of discovery in the fields of education, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience. UDL describes itself as a framework that can be used by educators to create inclusive learning environments that acknowledge the inherent variability in all learners. This mixed-methods, exploratory study investigates the application of UDL in two post-secondary online courses. It examines and portrays the instructors of the courses involved as learners through a series of interviews; explores the process of applying the UDL framework to modify a portion of their courses they are unhappy with; and reveals how these modifications affect the students in these courses using qualitative and quantitative methodologies. For both instructors involved in the study, comparisons were made between data collected in an unmodified control section, and a subsequent section of the same course containing the modifications. The implications the results have for the practice of teaching and learning design and education research at the post-secondary level are discussed.

Share

COinS
 

Thinking Matters Poster - Applying UDL in Online Courses

The Universal Design for Learning framework offers a synthesis of 40 years worth of discovery in the fields of education, cognitive psychology, and neuroscience. UDL describes itself as a framework that can be used by educators to create inclusive learning environments that acknowledge the inherent variability in all learners. This mixed-methods, exploratory study investigates the application of UDL in two post-secondary online courses. It examines and portrays the instructors of the courses involved as learners through a series of interviews; explores the process of applying the UDL framework to modify a portion of their courses they are unhappy with; and reveals how these modifications affect the students in these courses using qualitative and quantitative methodologies. For both instructors involved in the study, comparisons were made between data collected in an unmodified control section, and a subsequent section of the same course containing the modifications. The implications the results have for the practice of teaching and learning design and education research at the post-secondary level are discussed.

 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.

 
blog comments powered by Disqus