Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation

Authors

Elizabeth J. Parks-Stamm PhD, University of Southern MaineFollow
Peter M. Gollwitzer
Gabriele Oettingen

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-2007

Publication Title

Social Cognition

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if–then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if–process) and automating the goal–directed response to that cue (the then–process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if–process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then–process), alternative goal–directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.

Comments

© Guilford Publications Inc.

Recommended Citation

Parks-Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25, 247-264.