Comparing Instructional and Assessment Strategy Use in Graduate- and Undergraduate-Level Leadership Studies: A Global Study
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-15-2018
Publication Title
Journal of Leadership Education
Abstract
This study compares the differences in instructional and assessment strategy use between instructors who teach undergraduate- and graduate-level face-to-face, academic credit-bearing leadership studies courses. Findings suggest that, overall, discussion-based pedagogies, case studies, and self-assessments are the most frequently used instructional strategies, while instructors attach the most weight in their courses to term papers, group projects, and class participation/attendance. Further, undergraduate-level instructors use service learning far more in their instruction, while graduate instructors attach much greater value to term papers.
Recommended Citation
Jenkins, Daniel M. PhD, "Comparing Instructional and Assessment Strategy Use in Graduate- and Undergraduate-Level Leadership Studies: A Global Study" (2018). Faculty and Staff Scholarship. 102.
https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/usm-faculty-and-staff-scholarship/102