More as a recording. Doesn't say it's recording for you. Okay? Okay. Good. Hi everyone. Welcome. We're just gonna wait a few minutes to let folks join in. Thank you for coming. We'll just give it another minute. We'll have some folks coming in from the waiting room. All right. Let's go ahead and get started here. We want to make sure we stay on time. Hi, everyone. My name is Kaitlyn Madden. I am a graduate assistant at the US Office of Research and Cutler Institute. And it is my pleasure and privilege today to be your Zoom moderator and MC. We have a few technical notes before we get started. Whoops. Sorry. Okay, there we go. A few technical notes. Before we get started. We are going to be recording this event today for the US Office of Research Archive and also to be made available to anyone who was unable to attend the event today. If you do not wish to have your video as a part of the recording, please go ahead and click Stop video at the bottom of your Zoom screen. Now, we are also going to be offering closed captioning today. So if you'd like to utilize that, you can turn that on by clicking the direct link in the chat. For the duration of this event, all participants are going to be muted. So if you were going to open them chat momentarily, if you have any questions while the presentation's going on, you can submit those directly into the chat. And we will answer your questions periodically throughout the event. And then we'll also have some time at the end for questions and answers. Today. Tracy meagre of the Office of Research and Cutler Institute will be helping me out behind the scenes. So if you have any technical questions, please send them directly to either of us in the chat. Thanks, Caitlin. Hi everyone. I'm Sara Lee Casey, the coordinator of research instruction and Liaison Services at the US and libraries. And welcome to the third event of our 2021 research and scholarship symposium. Today's event is your publishing identity presented by Morisot, rural regional Solution Consultant at Clare of it. This event is brought to us by the US Office of Research, USAA and libraries and the Center for collaboration and development. Today's event is part of a newly re-imagined online research symposium series intended to bring together faculty, staff and students to celebrate all the wonderful research, scholarship and creative activity happening across us m. This virtual series will take place every Friday from noon to one until early April. The series will be a mix of skills-based workshops, lightning talk mini presentations covering a wide range of topics, research fields and experiences. And a keynote address from Dr. Langford of NYU on best practices for diversity, equity and inclusion and research. Registration. E-mails will be going out weekly and we hope you will join us. I would like to thank the US Office of Research, us some libraries and the Center for collaboration and development, Marissa glow and our planning committee for making today's event possible. And I would also like to thank all of you for joining us. Now it's my pleasure to introduce our workshop presenter for today's event, Mercer Bruegel. 0 is a regional Solution Consultant for Clare of it. She completed her ML IS at McGill University in 2015. After some previous Graduate Studies in the humanities. She has Blend bandwidth Clare of it since 2016, serving Canada and it's two official languages and is based in Montreal. She really enjoys helping users Excel and maximize how Web of Science can help researchers, librarians, and research evaluators without further ado. Here is Marisa. We hope you enjoy. Hello everyone and thank you for all for your attendance today. And I'll be taking questions throughout the session and afterwards. And also my email will be on the slides that I've shared with Zara that will be distributed as well. So without further ado, I will show you and share my screen. Okay, can everybody see my screen? Okay, so here you have my contact. So today we're going to talk about your publishing identity and train and do this. Today we're going to discuss how to have a publishing identity in your field. But not only also to find very relevant scholars in your field. So we're going to talk about the web of science and how to use it. And also because the Web of Science, we're in a big transition with a new interface. So we do index very high-quality content and only peer review materials. And we do, we're going to talk today about the multi-dimensional researcher profiles and how it is important to be visible and for your, your research to properly be distributed within your fields and in the right circles. So today we're going to concentrate on the Web of Science Core Collection. So the big purple center here. But the whole platform has many databases. So this all sand for a, a take home. So here we're going to focus on the core collection. And we were a bit of a victim of our name, Web of Science. But we are multi, the diamond and multidisciplinary database with a lot, not only science but social sciences, arts, and humanities. And we also have this emerging sources Citation Index where we do publish much smaller journals that are more regional focus and may not be, may not have a journal impact factor, which is a ranking number for journals. And our strength is that we were the first citation index that was discovery and implemented by Dr. Garfield in the 60s. So our added value is that we are publisher, belong, we are, we are curators and indexers, but we do not belong to a specific publisher. So our selection criteria is quite objective and unbiased. And we have, since our separation from Thomson Reuters and 2017, we have exponentially increased our open access content, making. Scholarly. Content much more accessible to all. So here we want to really focus on the Web of Science as a discovery platform. So to discover not only the research that is relevant or in your interest, but the authors and the researchers that may be very important collaborator. And this could, could be anywhere in the world because we do index all authors on all papers. And since 2008, all of these authors are linked to their institutional affiliation. So the name of the institution, whether it's academic, government or industry, and their address or their corresponding at least email address in, on it in each paper. So with over 3 million articles published annually, it's quite important that you are as a researcher, or if you'd like to bind a researcher, that they are searchable and that you can find them. So the cited references are for all papers go back to 9800. All author names and addresses are captured. The funding data from also and we're going to address the funding data on my next visit to Usain, which will be on the 5th of March. We do index the full acknowledgment paragraph on manuscripts. So funding agencies and grant numbers if present, if the authors diligently thank their finance. Their financial sources are indexed and searchable. So if you are working on a specific topic, you can, you'll also be able to find the funding agencies that fund these specific topics, whether in the US or around the world. We've also standardized the author affiliations because we, we unify institutions such as Usain as part of the University of Maine system and whatnot and any other research institute affiliated with us, Sam is under the USA banner. So also when we do claim to index a journal or conference proceedings or a book, we do index from cover to cover. We index all types of documents. So not only articles and not only reviews, but editorials, letters, corrections, and whatnot. And we have Web of Science is updated five times a week. So this is, this is the strength of the web of every record so or, or publication. We do index all of the items from the references. So the bibliography you'll have, you'll have access to all of the titles of the bibliographies, all of the citing articles. So anything that is citing this publication and also related records which will also help discover more collaborators, even if maybe a specific Researcher working in the same field or topic may not have cited directly this article. It may be citing a common article in the reference list. So we'll take a look at that and how that works. So Dr. Eugene Garfield is the founder of the Web of Science. Citation Index tends to bring together material that would never be collated by the usual subject indexing. It is best described as an association of ideas indexing. So this is where it really makes, makes it a discovery platform. Okay, So I'll leave these For as a take home. But we will be discussing hawks. So that's our open, not the open access content in the web of science through US MC library subscription, and also through any, any open access content that might be sitting in a repository, we link to over 4000 repositories worldwide. And this includes academic and government repositories. And we'll take a look on how to search for an author. I do want to mention that by the end of the month actuated the 25th of February, we will have another, a more responsible metric versus two to the h index, which will be the beam plot. So that will come into the product at the end of the month. And so you'll see that on the new Web of Science. And I can maybe talk about that on, on my next visit here. So I will also discuss problems. Problems is a, an open source product that is ours, that actually houses author profiles that, that have either a web of science researcher ID or an orchid. An orchid ID. So it's important early on, as early as you can as a researcher to create one of these identifier's, sue. So that, so that you are, that people can discover you, you can upload your, your scholarly activity as it comes. And I'll show you how Web of Science has a 2 relationship on updating your author identifier to your your publications. Okay, So without further ado, I will go into the product. So and I will show you, I will discuss the new our metamorphoses here, our new platform. So until we do the official launch of our new interface, all Web of Science users will have access to both. Both interfaces through, through different tabs. So I'm going to go to E. So this is our new interface, but I want to just explain. You'll have to come in through here, through your, through the library website and choose Web of Science. And I do suggest to create a profile for yourself. The advantages are that you can create saved lists of records. You can also create alerts. So if you are, for example, wanting to keep abreast or doing some information monitoring on a specific topic. I'm an offered. You can do so and I'll show you how to do that as well. So the this is the landing page for the, we'll call it the classic Web of Science. And this is the core collection. So these are all the indices are subjected to your subscription. So that may vary. But by clicking the big purple, purple button here, virtual button, you will get to the new interface which is here. So the new interface defaults to all fields, field. So it does default to the core collection or all databases. You can choose all databases as well. But we're going to focus on the core collection today because that is where we have the most fields and show you how the author search works as well. So we're going to go on a, on a simple topic for now and a topic that is not in the stem. So just to prove that we are multidisciplinary. So I've, I'm going to stay in the all fields, field, which really is not that particular with syntax, which can be difficult if, if you're not a librarian or if you're not working with your librarian, but I do suggest that you do that if you are doing some information monitoring, you'll want to set up an alert. You want to get specific as possible. So here I'm going to just launch a search on historical architecture or history architecture. And I can trunk and truncating here with a, with a star so that I can get all the variance here, such as the adjectives are the nouns or architectural and historical or history. I've truncated both of these words and I'm just going to launch. So the speed of a new web of Science is, is quite, have been, has improved. Let's make it a little bigger, has improved quite a bit. So here, it actually defaults by irrelevance, but you can change the order. So you can do, you can go with date, so you can do new twist to two older. And you can of course, read, read, read, revert to something else. So citations, for example, if you wanted to see what is the highly, highest cited work. So citations are important, they do indicate influence in the field. However, there's a lot of very good scholarship that never gets cited because I'm just a B or a lot of the times, we're unaware of the influential researchers in the field. So how we work is that, and I'll show you a full record here. Back to here. So this is a very broad search. So this is where I might want to change it here. So it's I, I, if I want to add, I want to change my all fields to the topic. I can look at history and architecture. Or I can, I can want them near each other, separated by five words, for example. And I can launch my search this way. So in this case, if I look at this, this record here, I have the, the author here. So but notice here that this was published in 2000. So as of 2008 we have the full first name, whereas before, journals did not require the full first name. However, each author is hyperlinked. So here and a lot of the times in social sciences and humanities, you will have a low count of authors. A lot of physics papers or chemistry papers. We have records went up to 5000 offers him they're all equal in our eyes and they're all affiliated with an address. So these are hyperlinked. And so if I am wanting to look at the author record of this of this researcher, I can click on it and it'll give me the offer record here. And actually this is an open access. So the my EndNote click, which is a free browser for all. We'll, we'll search for the, for the, for the full text. So here is interesting because I have the variance of the researcher's name and all of the variants that he's published in Web of Science and also owe the previous affiliations. So if you don't know the most recent affiliation and you're doing an author search. And there are too many results, which really shouldn't be the case because since October of 2019, we've really improved our disambiguation. With authors. So in this case, there was three previous affiliations or two previous affiliations to this one. And we have now also added the author position. So and this is very common in, in the social sciences, for example. So he was first author 93% of the time, the last author 5%, and a corresponding author 77% of the time. So this is interesting here. So this author has not claimed their record. But if I can go here and a search now for one of the authors here, I can go into my author search and search for Yvonne beyond. Hope I'm pronouncing this correctly. Yvonne has claimed or her author record, so there's a little green checkmark here, meaning that she has validated that it's these publications, she has 15 publications. Those are indeed hers. So what happens is that I can actually view the public profile On Pop lines that this creates automatically. So she has both an author, a researcher ID and an author, an orchid ID. Go going on here. So this is the pub one's profile for very vine. So he or she has both publications and peer review activity. So put ones was really created to to give a thankless job of peer reviewing some value and can be also in the end, this is actually used by publishers to find peer reviewers in their research fields. So, so there are research field tags here. All the publications are automatically populated since she puts on her her identifier here on all her publications. So the good news is that there is a push pull or a 2 updating process that we have with Web of Science. So when you submit a manuscript to be published, and let's say you include so you, you, you ideally include your author identifier at the time of the manuscript submission. But if you don't and update your profile either on pub blondes are on or kid, then Web of Science will update it on in return. So whether you submitted before or after, It's very good to have it, to have it's updated because this will populate your publications and the citations where Okay, so here we have the summary, we have the metrics, so the number of publications versus the citations. And of course, the publications that we saw in which journals. So once you do find a researcher or if it's herself, you can actually list all the journals that you've published in so that if anyone in your fields, they can also discover those journals. And we don't only lists the journals that we index. For example, this last one we don't index, but since she's published in 10 in this journal, we we still we still put it in the list. And the peer review activity. So she's reviewed one, she's got one peer review in medical care. And so the journal actually verifies that she was indeed a peer reviewer for this journal. And that's all the information that is available on the profile of the peer reviews remain anonymous and they remain confidential as they should be. So here we have her her title. She is in the mosquito School of Public Service at USF. And the total time she was she was cited for each index to be used with caution, of course. And a web of science researcher ID as well is on there. But in my author search, what is interesting is that I can take these publications and view as a set. And after the author position which are also here, we also have the top coauthors. So her, her top collaborators can be also of interest to you if they are, if you are in the same field or if you're, if you're looking at multi-disciplinary research or, or, or whatnot. So, and all of these, again, are also hyperlinked. So it'll bring me to the author profile of this other collaborator. And so where is he? He's in Minneapolis. And he said You Minnesota System and whatnot. So it's the endless vortex of collaborators and whatnot. But I'll show you how to, to find a collaborator in a specific field as bells. So if I'm going to relaunch my search in the new Web of Science. I also wanted to show you that you can actually tweak your search on this page and not having to go back to the search history. So if I want to change my two key words and put them in a title, or if I want to put them in my topic search, a topic search will go retrieve these keywords in the title abstract or keywords, which are all elements that can help you find relevant collaborate errors. So I want to look at, so I have a quite a bit of results here. So do I want to refine my search? So I want to now add New England to the mix because I'm working on historical architecture in New England. So this is now a really refine my search. So I can go into analyze the results and take a look at who my, who the authors are on these topics. So here I've obviously refined it very much so, but in looking at analyze results, I can go into offers. I can go into affiliations. Which affiliations, which university works on my topic. If you're looking for a collaborator brain, if you're a graduate student, if you're looking for an external reader on your thesis committee. And again, the funding. So who's funding research on this topic? And open access and whatnot. So the Web of Science categories, for example, are are the categories that, that the records belong to, that, that are at the journal level. So this is quite important to know. So if I'm looking at the authors, I'm here and take a look at, I can select or I can really focus on one or the other and and take a look at the records and see if they are indeed relevant. So I can go back and I'm going to launch my wide search up again. I can refine my quick filters here by highly cited paper. So here I'm refining by citations. And I can look at if I want, if I want both of these keywords in same concept, I'll have to put them into brackets. That will reduce my, my search string and it'll make it a lot more relevant. So here I have an author called malate in sociological review, 555, 45 citation. So I can, I can sort by relevance. But each funds to take a look at what would be a better match for my topic and to find the right collaborators or people who interested in working with me or in any realm of the scholarly circle. So here, another thing is that I can save these to a mark list. So this is the advantage of creating your profile. Once you create your profile in the classic Web of Science, you, it'll transfer automatically here. You'll also have, we also have lib guides and you can take a look at how blondes. We do have a free version of a note with all Web of Science. End. Going back to Web of Science classes. So here we also have the Resource Center. You can, you can choose to have a guided tour if you'd like to. We have a pen Don't technology, which will actually give you a guided tour and can, and can tell you how to perform certain tasks or whatnot. You can also export certain results in Excel. And now the export has increased. Finally, from it 500 records to 11000 records. You can export that to Excel. And if you wanted to do a literature review or whatnot, that could be there. For example, in this topic, I can, I can click on Citation Report and take a look on how the topic is doing with time. Obviously, this has been exponentially growing topic through time. And here as well, I can have the list of records here by the number of citation in the new interface. You can take a look at who is citing these these articles or, or reviews. And i'm, I'm, I'm using articles to be generic, but it could be a book, chapters or whatnot. So this you can discover also collaborate through this because they might not be in their reference lists more. However, they can, you can find other pertinent collaborators through whoever is citing. So here you can create, once you've created your brilliant search string by yourself or with your librarian, you can create an alert. Whereas every time Web of Science is updated with a topic that you are, that you are following. You'll receive an email and you can decide on the frequency of this. You can create an alert. Your librarian can do so for yourself or you can do it. And so it's historical architecture. And then you can create the alert. So you can manage the alert. And C, you have to, you can choose the frequency of the alert, whereas it could be weekly or monthly. And so once I have found, for example, if I go back to searching my offer, I can also export all of their publication here. So view as a set of results, right? Or I can click on the citation report for this author as well. But I can export all of Ivan's publications here and I can save them to a Marked List. So I'm going to create a list for Yvonne so that I can create a list and then I can create an alert. So every time something new is published, I can then add it to my list afterwards. So here are my refinement options, my publication years, or in decreasing document types if I don't want. For example, I'm only looking at articles. I can refine and all my options here we'll, will appear on my refining options here, Web of Science categories, and here are my authors again, right? So if you click see all these are all the authors that she's collaborated with and the affiliations as well. So if you, for example, only want to see scholarship from the US, uk, you can do that. You can do that in countries and regions. And you can. Obviously now I'm looking at her. So she's only has collaboratives from the US. But sometimes you want to take a look at a topic that is very, very prominent in Scandinavia or with one of the Scandinavian countries. And you can choose to look at collaborations with only a specific country as well, or at the same time with a specific institution as well. So I will take a pause and see if there are any questions. Thanks, Marisa. So far we don't have any questions, but maybe from folks are typing from it now, but when you go ahead and continue on, Okay, Great. So other fields in the Web of Science include all. So these, these are new fields, are indexing dates. If you want to look at certain keywords and only the abstract and not title abstracting keywords. So going back to the full record, another, another important field are the keywords. So here we have author keywords. These keywords can give you extra lexicon to, for example, modify your search and go back to your search string and say, Oh, I didn't think of, of adding architectural theory to my search. Or architectural historiography, which actually is what happens when you truncate early enough within the word to get various variants of the same word, right? So here we have climate, and here is how we do link all of so here the authors, all of these authors, so not all of them. So here we have 10 authors on the publication and five of them had OR gate numbers. So whether there's only one or whether all of them have an identifier. This is where this is the field where we include their identifier. And these are hyperlinked. So you can actually click and it'll bring you to there or to the org page of the author and question. Most of these profiles in the kit are public. But sometimes they may be private, but usually people want to have this accessible. So we have employment, work and publications. So the work and ID sometimes you may include in your signature, your email signature. So various ways this way. Miranda, here we have yes. Sorry. We have a couple of questions now and I wondered array you wanted to take a couple of those? Yes, absolutely. Go ahead. Okay. One is is our orchid number associated with Web of Science or only the researcher ID. O orchid as well. So we, we, we, if we have an updating relationship with both Researcher ID is our creation actually. And we actually gave the code in 2012 to orchid. An orchid was created based on research ID. But we, we index both. So just pick one. We're happy when researchers have one and it is religiously populated. So that's the big challenge. So we do, we do index books, as you can see here. Here there's two columns. It's just that these authors all have kids and not researcher IDs. But we have a yes. Perfect. The next question or if it's a question and a comment, it says, please discuss a bit more about the citations that authors may cite, but you do not index. Could any of these authors citations be from predatory journals? Okay, So that's an excellent question. So we do have very rigorous quality control and Web of Science and every year, whether it's a new journal, but every year we do have journals, depressions. There are not many out of the 21 thousand journals that we index and core collection. Some years we'll have 13. Some areas will have about 20 suppressions. Suppressions occur when either the journal is misbehaving and that's either it's self citing too much. So self-citations are normal. And normal phenomena. We build our own research and the smaller the field, the higher the self citation, because we're a, we're building on our own research and we're going to cite or previous work BY, we're often working with the same collaborators, must have most of our career. So that also counts as a self citation. But in larger fields, the self citation percentage. A lower tolerance from our editorial team, and this is when a journal may be suppressed. And also so we do include all citations. Even when, for example, if I look here, I'll go back search results. Sorry, I went too far. If I click by relevance and I do highest to lowest. Okay, so this paper has all of these citations. We might not index all of them, but we will include them in the list. And if something, if we don't have a citation in our list, because we are very, very religious to the manuscript. So if it's on the manuscript, even if it's an item we don't index, it should be on there. It's just that it might have a lot less fields. Or for example, we don't index trade publication or gray literature which our government reports or whatnot. But we should still, you should still see the citation on there. But do let us know if you think that there was a citation that doesn't appear in the cited article list. Let us know and you can let us know either eye contacting or here there's there's a place where you can submit a correction on the full record. Okay. We have a couple more questions. One is Can you show how people can claim their Web of Science profile? Yes, absolutely. So once you perform your search with with your name, it's basically let me take let me take one of her collaborators here that had not. And I'll show you. So bonds clever. So she's claimed hers and all she had to do is click. I'm claiming so one of her collaborators here. So, so this, this is how you would claim it. So once you find yourself and you want to know, you want to check that everything is correct. If it's not, you can submit a correction here. But this is how you would claim your record and of course you would have to be signed in. This is our quality control because not anyone can do that, but only Eric, deeper, deeper ink here can do this. So are you this author very far you work control how your name, title, institution, and profile, and then claim land, record. The Wednesday. I will press on here. It wouldn't work because I'm Marissa, I can claim my record and it'll bring me to the pub lines. Because if I don't have a pub lens profile. It will create a researcher ID on pipelines automatically by cleaning my record. I hope that answers your question. Awesome. Thank you. Okay. So this one has a lot going on. So it says I'm looking at my own profile in pub lawns, and it's missing several papers I've authored. I've just imported them using their DOIs, but no information seems to be coming in with them. Example, number of citations. Why is this? Can I change that? And then they also follow that up by thing. Also, the number of citations noted on my articles are lower than what is shown and Google Scholar, while yeah. Okay. So Google Scholar is not a curated database. Even though the citations are not DD, blue gate it asks about the difference between google Scholar is algorithmic, whereas Web of Science or Scopus or any other citation index, these are curated and their associated with each citation has an actual records to it. So it's normal that on Google Scholar, you may get more citations that then on your pub lines because problems will have to really identify where that one citation is coming from. But however you can definitely perform. If you if you send me you can send me an email and saying if there's something missing on your pipelines profile or your kid, if by updating your if it's a researcher ID, you have been couple lines is where this is housed. If it's working, you can update it in your org it and I will include some information on how to do that. And that will automatically update your public profile once you updated that way. To hope that makes sense. Awesome. Thank you. Okay, So our next question says, My pal blondes profile is linked to a former institution. I no longer have access to that university email. How do I claim my record? Okay. So first of all, we're going to have to perform a change on your author profiles so that you could do directly on here. So the error, because once you've claimed your profile, nobody else can, can perform corrections. So here for example, here all of the affiliation. So if you want to update your affiliation, you can do so from your profile. Showing you here. This is the bottom claim, my record. So you can you can submit a correction right here. So see here it already says Euhemerus a recoil. You can't. And so you can submit a correction and you can go ahead and add your recent affiliation. And it's two, and there's actually humans. It's not algorithmic. There we have humans that will update that for you and therefore update your entire profile. And so you can, you can then sign in and create your your Web of Science with with your new affiliation as well. Great. Thanks, Marissa. That's all the questions we have so far. So good. I'll let you carry on. Good. Okay. Here we go. So this is a good, actually, a good example. Sorry, I wanted to go back to Eric's profile here on all of your organizations. So he probably started publishing in grad school. And then every time you have a different affiliation and you could be cross appointed as well with another institution or received a grant from while you were a visiting professor or visiting lecturer somewhere else. And the grant was conditional to you affiliating yourself with this secondary affiliation. So there's, there's a lot of hairy details of that can really make it complex. But this is why our new algorithm is that 96 percent. So it really should disambiguate. If you do get more, too many, too many hits, it will really give you different. I'll give you an example here. One of our nutritions hearing. I mean, we have his profile. You have three versions of this profile even though he's claimed his profile. So Vincent here, if this is the same person, this is the same and we have the same affiliation. There are 26 on here because these are from a proceedings and this is we have this one straggler here, even though he's claimed his profile. Here we have three bits on a heap. Yeah, so these are the organization. So if it does get hairy, a lot of Asian names will give you a lot of results even though they're completely different people. And so the subject categories are also an option to refine and organizations, and you don't have to know that the most recent organization, that's the beauty of it. You can. Well, I thought he was a XYZ University but he's no longer there. It doesn't matter. It will be list it should be listed on here. And you should find so look at all the so these are all the affiliations that he's had. So you can always do the refinement through here. That's all I have for today. Please send any further questions either via Sarah or directly to myself through my email. I'll also include other resources. We do have lib guides and we do have researcher and author resources on there that I'll add on for any anymore questions. Thank you, Marissa. That was a wonderful presentation. We do have a couple more minutes to take a couple of questions. If there are some if we for some reason run out of time to get to your question, as Marissa said, we're happy to follow up via e-mail to answer those for you all. So just submit your questions to the chat if you have them and we have one. It says, it's not clear to me what the revenue generation mechanism is for this service, which is free to authors, could there be conflicts of interest? I don't understand the question. For for the author position on records. Sherm. Maybe. Well, worst case. We can. How does Web of Science make money? Maybe clarify, okay. This is a subscription, so this is a subscription-based. So US I'm subscribes to you web of Science, and then you get to have the access through your email and password that you can create. So all of the resources that the library subscribes to you have access with your institutional affiliation, e-mail or phone. Thank you. They fed banks. So it's universe that eBay for very helpful. Yeah, If we also have government agencies that subscribe and in an industry, corporations. But universities are, I mean, users for sure. Okay, So unless I'm missing any, I don't see any more questions. And we're almost out of time. So I will go ahead and invite you all to participate in a three minute anonymous survey about today's event. You can do that by clicking the link in the chat that was just submitted by Tracy. And it will say, thank you so much to Marissa for presenting this to us. And thank you to Sarah for joining us to introduce Marissa. Thank you all for attending. And we hope you enjoyed it. Morris is going to be back with us and two weeks to present our final workshop called your next big idea. So be sure to check in for that. And as we mentioned at the beginning of this session, we will be sending more registration e-mails for all of you all. So for all the events, be on the lookout for those, and register and write your colleagues and students to join us. And that is all we have for today. Unless there's any last minute questions, we'll finish up. Thank you for a great attendance, thank for the organ to the organizers to have these great, great sessions. These are very, very helpful. Awesome. Looks like we're all fat though. Thanks everyone. Have a great day. Thank you. Same to you.